IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Print ISSN: 2581-4796

Online ISSN: 2581-480X

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 503

PDF Downloaded: 503


Get Permission Binta, Augustin, Nene, Medina, Sidy, Malick, Benjamin, and Babacar: Disinfection and sterilization of fixed prosthesis shade guides: A survey of dentists in Senegal


Introduction

The discovery of new pathogens, and recent health crises, have made health care safety a major requirement.1, 2, 3 Every day, dental surgeons carry out numerous procedures requiring reusable instruments.4, 5 The shade guide is the most used instrument for determining tooth color. During color measurement, it meets mucous membranes and oral fluids that may contain germs.6, 7 According to Spauding's classification of medical/surgical devices according to their capacity to transmit infection, the teintier is a semi-critical material, at an intermediate risk level. To avoid any risk of cross-contamination, the material must be treated.8, 4

Shades must undergo intermediate-level disinfection, but the boundary between semi-critical and critical material is often problematic, as there may be blood in the oral fluids. 9 In addition, disinfection is carried out using chemicals that are not always appropriate.5, 9 Alcohol and aldehydes are still used, although they are not recommended.10, 11

For the sterilization of non-thermosensitive medical devices, only the use of a type B autoclave is recommended, with a temperature of 134°C maintained for 18 minutes.7, 11 In fact, some countries have banned the use of sterilizers.1, 8 Other countries regularly update and disseminate guidelines for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections.9, 12

The aim of this study was to evaluate the disinfection and sterilization techniques of shade guides after the color survey of dental surgeons practicing in Senegal.

Material and Methods

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The survey was carried out during an international congress of dentistry organized in Dakar from June 28 to 29, 2019. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to dental surgeons practicing in Senegal and satisfying the selection criteria.

The questionnaire included a section on socio-demographic data and a section on disinfection and sterilization.

Disinfection-related questions concerned the products used and their application techniques.

The sterilization equipment used was identified as either autoclave or poupinel. The level of disinfection and the means used to treat the shade guide were asked.

Data were entered using Epi Info version 7 software and analyzed using SPSS version 22 software. Qualitative variables were described in terms of numbers and percentages. Quantitative variables were described by mean with standard deviation, extremes and median. Statistical tests used were the Chi-square test. The difference was statistically significant when the p-value was strictly less than 0.05. The odd-ratio surrounded by its 95% confidence interval was used to determine the strength of the relationship.

Results

A total of 125 questionnaires were distributed to dentists meeting the selection criteria, and 113 were completed and collected.

More than half the dentists (58.4%) were male. The sex ratio was 1.4 (M/F). The average age of the dentists was 39 ± 8 years. A total of 54.0% of dental surgeons were in the public sector. The average number of years in practice was 11 ± 7.2 years, with extremes of 1 or 40 years.

Alcohol was used to disinfect stains by 51.3% of dental surgeons (Figure 1).

8% of dentists said they used soaking to disinfect stains (Table 1)

Among dentists, 88.9% used the autoclave and 11.2% the Poupinel.

There was no statistically significant relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and the use of disinfectants for shade guides (Table 2).

Chemical disinfection by immersion was the most widely used. No statistically significant differences were noted (Table 3).

Among dentists, 31.9% claimed to sterilize shade guides (Table 4).

There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of shade guide sterilization technique according to gender p value = 0.177(table IV). The use of autoclave sterilization was 52.2% for dentists with less than 5 years' experience versus 21.3% for those with more than 5 years' experience, with a p value = 0.005 (table IV).

Figure 1

Distribution of dental surgeons according to disinfection products used on shade guides.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/5a28ab80-5655-4aab-9bbb-a7b12ce65ccf/image/b6328636-d5d6-4160-ad04-b98249aef048-uimage.png

Table 1

Distribution of dental surgeons according to disinfection methods for shade guides

Method for disinfecting shade guides

Frequency

Percentage

Spray

36

31,9

Immersion

71

62,8

Do not know

6

5,3

Total

113

100,0

Table 2

Disinfection products by socio-demographic and professional characteristics

Characteristics

Shade guide disinfection products

Alcohol

Sodium hypochlorite

Quaternary ammonium

Other

P value

N(%)

N(%)

N(%)

N(%)

Total

Age

0,065

<35 ans

24(64,9)

6(16,2)

0(0,0)

7(18,9)

37

≥35 ans

34(44,7)

24(21,6)

6(7,9)

12(15,8)

76

Gender

0,071

Female

20(42,5)

12(25,5)

2(4,3)

13(27,7)

47

Male

38(57,6)

18(27,3)

4(6,1)

6(9,1)

66

Sector of activity

0,569

Public

30(49,2)

14(23,0)

3(4,9)

14(23,0)

61

Private

21(56,8)

10(27,0)

2(5,4)

4(10,8)

37

Parapublic

7(46,7)

6(40,0)

1(6,7)

1(6,7)

15

Years of Exercise

0,292

< 5 years

16(66,7)

5(20,8)

0(0,0)

3(12,5)

24

≥ 5 years

42(47,2)

25(28,1)

6(6,7)

16(18,0)

89

Speciality

0,118

Yes

24(53,3)

10(22,2)

5(11,1)

6(13,3)

45

No

34(50,0)

20(29,4)

1(1,5)

13(19,1)

68

Table 3

Chemical disinfection techniques by socio-demographic and occupational characteristics

Socio-demographic characteristics

Disinfection by

Spray

Immersion

Do not know

P value

N(%)

N(%)

N(%)

Total

Age

0,275

<35 years

9(24,3)

27(73,0)

1(2,7)

37

≥35 years

27(35,5)

44(57,9)

5(6,6)

76

Gender

0,863

Female

14(29,8)

30(63,8)

3(6,4)

47

Male

22(33,3)

41(62,1)

3(4,6)

66

Sector of activity

0,389

Public

19(31,2)

37(60,7)

5(8,2)

61

Private

10(27,0)

26(70,3)

1(2,7)

37

Parapublic

7(46,7)

8(53,3)

0(0,0)

15

Years of Exercise

0,659

< 5 years

6(25,0)

17(70,8)

1(4,2)

24

≥ 5 years

30(33,7)

54(60,7)

5(5,6)

89

Speciality

0,770

Yes

16(35,7)

27(60,0)

2(4,4)

45

No

20(29,4)

44(64,7)

4(5,9)

68

Table 4

Sterilization by socio-demographic characteristics

Socio-demographic characteristics

Sterilization materials

Poupinel

Autoclave

No sterilization

P value

N(%)

N(%)

N(%)

Total

Age

0,008

<35 years

2(5,4)

17(46,0)

18(48,6)

37

≥35 years

2(2,6)

15(19,7)

59(77,6)

76

Sexe

0,177

Female

3(6,4)

10(21,3)

34(72,3)

47

Male

1(1,5)

22(33,3)

43(65,1)

66

Secteur of activity

0,620

Public

3(4,9)

14(23,0)

44(72,1)

61

Private

1(2,7)

13(35,1)

23(62,2)

37

Parapublic

0(0,0)

5(33,3)

10(66,7)

15

Years of Exercise

0,005

< 5 years

1(4,2)

13(54,2)

10(41,7)

24

≥ 5 years

3(3,4)

19(21,3)

67(75,3)

89

Spécialité

0,765

Oui

1(2,2)

12(26,7)

32(71,1)

45

Non

3(4,4)

20(29,4)

45(66,2)

68

Discussion

During visual color measurement, the shade guide meets mucous membranes and saliva. To avoid any risk of cross-contamination, they must be treated before re-use.7, 8, 13 Equipment can be treated by chemical and/or thermal means.

This study showed that alcohol was the main disinfectant used, unlike the one carried out in Ireland, which showed glutaraldehyde as the main disinfectant.14 However, as in that study, alcohol is one of the products used in Saudi Arabia for disinfecting stains.15

The shade guides are made of ceramic with a stainless-steel handle. During color measurement, the shade guide meets saliva, which is a biological liquid containing proteins. Alcohol binds proteins to stainless steel, which raises the question of its effectiveness as a disinfectant. It is inactivated by organic matter and tends to cause organic debris to stick to surfaces. In addition to its ineffectiveness on spores, it has little effect on viruses and complicates the sterilization chain because it is a fixative. 6, 10

However, more than half of all dental surgeons soak stains for disinfection. Compared with the spray technique, there is better contact between the chemical and the medical device during soaking. So, for chemical disinfection, the immersion technique is the most recommended. 1, 8

Although banned in other countries, the study shows that dry heat sterilization is still used in Senegal. It does not guarantee prion destruction. Autoclaving is the preferred method of sterilization. Sterilizing all medical devices that can withstand this treatment is a simple gesture that provides the highest degree of safety. Having just one channel for processing medical devices - sterilization - simplifies the work of the practice's staff and streamlines the control stages. 1, 8

Nevertheless, among those who sterilize shade guide, it is interesting to note the widespread use of the autoclave (88.9%). Autoclave sterilization is significantly correlated with the age of the practitioner, with just under half of dentists aged under 35 using it (p value=0.008%). Professional experience also has an impact on autoclave use, with more than half of dentists with less than 5 years' experience using it, with a statistically significant difference (p value=0.005). Young dentists may have benefited from the new recommendations during their training. As continuing education is not compulsory in Senegal, former graduates may not always update their knowledge.

Conclusion

The recent and ongoing health crisis is a reminder of the importance of infectious risk management. Senegalese dental surgeons use disinfection rather than sterilization following the contamination of teintiers. Despite the ban on the use of poupinel in some countries, and the difficulty of using alcohol in the decontamination and sterilization chain, these two practices are still relatively common in Senegal.

This study has shown that more needs to be done to limit cross-contamination.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

Grille technique d’évaluation des cabinets dentaires pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins2015Parishttps://www.fncs.org/sites/default/files/pdf/GRILLE_DEVALUAT_DES_CAB_DENTAIRES_oct_2011.pdf

2 

A Upendran R Gupta Z Geiger Dental Infection ControlStatPearls [Internet]Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing2022http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470356/[6 March 2023]

3 

DW Bates DM Levine H Salmasian A Syrowatka DM Shahian S Lipsitz The Safety of Inpatient Health CareN Engl J Med202338821425310.1056/NEJMsa2206117

4 

Direction générale de la santé. Guide de prevention des infections liées aux soins en chirurgie dentaire et en stomatologie. juill 2006200610

5 

CDTSO Corrêa P Sousa CT Reis Patient safety in dental care: an integrative reviewCad Saude Publica20203610e001978110.1590/0102-311X00197819

6 

SC Deogade V Suresan A Galav J Rathod SS Mantri SM Patil Awareness, knowledge, and attitude of dental students toward infection control in prosthodontic clinic of a dental school in IndiaNiger J Clin Pract2018215553910.4103/njcp.njcp_81_17

7 

H Dashti A Moraditalab M Mohammadi HR Haghi Assessment of Color Changes in Vita 3D-Master Shade Guide after Sterilization and DisinfectionJ Dent Mater Tech2017624853

8 

WA Rutala DJ Weber Disinfection, sterilization, and antisepsis: An overviewAm J Infect Control2019473910.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.018

9 

WA Rutala DJ Weber Reprocessing semicritical items: Current issues and new technologiesAm J Infect Control2016445 Suppl536210.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.029

10 

DM Costa LKO Lopes H Hu AFV Tipple K Vickery Alcohol fixation of bacteria to surgical instruments increases cleaning difficulty and may contribute to sterilization inefficacyAm J Infect Control201745881610.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.286

11 

E Laneve B Raddato M Dioguardi G Gioia G Troiano LL Muzio Sterilisation in Dentistry: A Review of the LiteratureInt J Dent2019650728610.1155/2019/6507286

12 

ML Ling P Ching A Widitaputra A Stewart N Sirijindadirat LTA Thu APSIC guidelines for disinfection and sterilization of instruments in health care facilitiesAntimicrob Resist Infect Control201872510.1186/s13756-018-0308-2

13 

PY Huang R Masri E Romberg CF Driscoll The effect of various disinfectants on dental shade guidesJ Prosthet Dent201411236137

14 

CM Healy HPO Kearns WA Coulter M Stevenson FJT Burke Autoclave use in dental practice in the Republic of IrelandInt Dent J20045441826

15 

AS Arrejaie The Effect of Chemical Disinfectants on the Color of a Porcelain Shade GuideInt J Health Sci (Qassim)201483299304



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

147-151


Authors Details

Cisse Binta*, Sawadogo Augustin, Thioune Nene, Fall Medina, Dabo Papa Sidy, Sow Massaer Malick, Djeredou Benjamin, Mbodj Elhadji Babacar


Article History

Received : 04-08-2023

Accepted : 02-09-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files