IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Print ISSN: 2581-4796

Online ISSN: 2581-480X

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 571

PDF Downloaded: 453


Get Permission Wilson, Nair, Harshakumar K, and Prasanth V: Prosthetic rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed prosthesis in a completely edentulous patient: A clinical report


Introduction

Rehabilitating a completely edentulous patient with a fixed implant-supported prosthesis requires a carefully designed and well-executed treatment strategy. The transition from a failing natural dentition to an implant-supported fixed prosthesis poses various challenges in treatment planning. Branemark’s original surgical protocol involved a healing period where implants had to be submerged within the bone for 4-6 months before loading.1 Fully or partially edentulous patients had to refrain from wearing dentures for two weeks following surgery and spend an extended period wearing a removable prosthesis during this healing phase. Later on, Ledermann introduced an immediate loading protocol to surmount these shortcomings, and it is well documented that this period is not necessary for implant success, provided factors contributing to bone-to-implant healing are given paramount importance.2 The survival rate of immediately loaded implants is comparable to the long-term outcomes achieved with the conventional 2-stage implant protocol.3, 2, 4 A sufficient bone quantity is required in the conventional surgical approach (at least 13–15 mm length and 5-7 mm width) for a successful treatment outcome. 5 Successful osseointegration with immediately loaded implants requires excellent primary stability, prolonged implant stabilization by splinting during the healing phase, controlled occlusion, and a biocompatible prosthetic material. 6 The implant-bone interface will be characterized by noncalcified, collagenous, poorly vascularized scar tissue if there is excessive relative motion (macro motions) that exceeds 150 mm. 7, 8, 9 A rough implant surface is advised to prevent the detrimental effects of micromotions and to prevent fibrin clot adherence on the implant surface during the early stages of recovery.10 Primary implant stability is influenced by bone quality and quantity, implant design, and surgical technique. To obtain adequate primary implant stability, dentists must modify the drilling technique and fixture selection for the clinical scenario based on the type and quantity of the bone. 11 However, in patients with atrophied jaw bones, implant placement is difficult, especially if immediate loading needs to be implemented. In such cases, alternative treatment options such as bone augmentation techniques, bone regeneration techniques, maxillary sinus lift procedures, etc. need to be considered. Basal implants and pterygoid implants can be contemplated as an alternative treatment strategy to avoid the risks of extensive surgical procedures requiring multiple surgeries, eliminating patient discomfort and treatment expenditure. The basal bone, which is less prone to resorption and infection, possesses a high load-bearing capacity so that the basal implants can be immediately loaded.

The purpose of this case report was to describe the oral rehabilitation of an edentulous patient with an atrophied maxilla and mandible using a fixed implant-supported prosthesis utilizing an immediate loading protocol and basal implants, thus eliminating the necessity of using a removable provisional prosthesis.

Case Report

A 58-year-old female patient was referred to the Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College, Trivandrum, for restoration of her completely edentulous maxilla and mandible with a fixed full-arch implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. The patient had been completely edentulous for one year and according to the patient's history, she had undergone numerous dental procedures to save her remaining teeth before becoming completely edentulous. Most of her teeth were removed due to severe decay. Extraoral examination revealed no facial asymmetry, swelling, or palpable lymph nodes with a convex facial profile. No abnormalities were detected on the TMJ examination. Intra-oral examination disclosed a well-healed, completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular arch covered by adequate attached and keratinized mucosa (Figure 1) and a proclined premaxilla, indicating skeletal class II relation. A detailed diagnostic work-up was carried out, including panoramic X-rays, cone beam computed tomographic evaluations, and prosthodontic, and implant-surgical evaluations. Computed tomograms and panoramic radiographs were used to support the clinical information that was obtained. Radiographic findings revealed insufficient bone height in the posterior maxilla in the sinus region and the posterior mandible bilaterally (Figure 2). A comprehensive treatment plan was subsequently proposed as the patient insisted on a fixed prosthesis, which is the least traumatic, so that the treatment could be completed in a short period of time. The patient agreed to have maxillary and mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses after listening to the advantages, disadvantages, and other considerations of various treatment alternatives.

Initial phase

Maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts were made. Tentative jaw relation and vertical dimensions were recorded. Routine blood examinations and blood glucose level assessments were done, and the results were within normal limits.

Surgical phase

The patient was prepared according to the standard surgical protocol.12 Posterior superior alveolar, infraorbital, nasopalatine, and greater palatine nerve blocks were administered bilaterally in the maxillary arch, and the inferior alveolar nerve block was administered bilaterally in the mandibular arch. Eight implants were placed in the maxilla and six implants were placed in the mandible using a flapless surgical procedure (Figure 3). Two pterygoid implants were placed bilaterally, engaging the lateral pterygoid plates. A post-surgical panoramic radiograph revealed the placement of basal implants in the proper orientation (Figure 4). Maxillary and mandibular impressions were made using irreversible hydrocolloid material at the same appointment. An acrylic resin provisional prosthesis was fabricated by indirect technique at the established vertical dimension for both the maxillary and mandibular arch and cemented using zinc oxide eugenol temporary restorative cement. The patient was advised to follow a soft diet for the next 4 months, and chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% was prescribed for rinsing the oral cavity for chemical plaque control.

Definitive prosthodontic treatment

The patient was recalled after 4 months of post-operative healing. Radiographic evaluation revealed successful osseointegration. The acrylic provisional restorations on both arches were removed. Maxillary and mandibular impressions were made using the addition silicone elastomeric impression material using a two-step putty wash impression technique, and casts were poured in die stone (Type V gypsum).13 Acrylic custom trays were fabricated for both the maxillary and mandibular arch, with an occlusal made over them and tentative jaw relations recorded using Aluwax. The master cast was then articulated in a semi-adjustable articulator via facebow transfer and interocclusal record (Figure 5). A diagnostic wax mockup was made to assess the shape and placement of the definitive restorations. A putty index of the wax mock-up was made, and provisional restoration was fabricated using an indirect technique. Intraoral and extraoral factors, such as the facial midline, vertical dimension of occlusion, and smile analysis, were evaluated. The aesthetic appearance, comprising tooth length, width, and form, was also evaluated. The metal framework was cast in cobalt-chromium alloy, and intraorally, a framework try-in was done, followed by verification of the centric relation record using the bite registration from the articulator (Figure 6). After a successful metal try-in, definitive interocclusal records were obtained using Zhemack Occlufast rock bite registration material. In the next appointment, an intra-oral bisque try-in was performed, and occlusal adjustments were made to create a canine-guided mutually protected occlusion (Figure 7). The final cement-retained metal-ceramic prosthesis was subsequently glazed and polished (Figure 8). The occlusion in both centric and lateral excursions, phonetics, and aesthetics was verified before cementation. (Figure 9). The definitive cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic prosthesis was then luted with resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Post-treatment patient assessment and occlusal evaluation were carried out following a strict recall every month for six months. The patient was satisfied with the prosthesis in terms of aesthetics and function (Figure 10).

Figure 1

Maxillary and mandibular residual alveolar ridge

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image1.png
Figure 2

Pre-operative CBCT with radiographic resin template on both arches

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image2.png
Figure 3

Post operative view after flapless implant placement

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image3.png
Figure 4

Post operative radiographic view

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image4.png
Figure 5

Facebow record transfer to semi adjustable articulator for articulating the master casts.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image5.png
Figure 6

Metal framework try in and definitive interocclusal records

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image6.png
Figure 7

Bisque try in

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image7.png
Figure 8

Final single unit cement retained implant supported fixed prosthesis

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image8.png
Figure 9

Prosthesis in situ- in centric occlusion

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image9.jpeg
Figure 10

Pre operative and post operative photographs

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7ee7bb86-be36-4187-a0bd-e8b9c983cc05image10.png

Discussion

Rehabilitation of a completely edentulous patient with a fixed implant-supported prosthesis requires a detailed pre-treatment evaluation and a proper understanding of various treatment options and prosthetic designs. The two treatment options that could be considered for this particular patient are conventionally loaded implants and immediate loading implants. The drawback of conventional loading implants is that the patient has to wear a removable prosthesis throughout the healing period. During this healing phase, the implant site has to be in a non-loaded environment, ideally according to Branemark’s surgical protocol.3 Immediate loading provides the benefit of providing a fixed prosthesis option throughout the interim period, which shortens the treatment phase and avoids an edentulous situation. A literature search analysis by Romanos et al. reported that the survival rate for implants that are immediately loaded is comparable to the long-term outcomes attained with the traditional 2-stage implant strategy. The assumption that osseointegration with implants under immediate functional occlusal loading can be successfully achieved was supported by histologic evidence based on human and animal investigations.3 A fixed prosthesis can be supported in the fully edentulous mandible with four or more immediate loaded implants, with a success rate of 95–100% as reported by Ostman et al.6 The data from the 5-year retrospective study on the survival rate of immediately loaded dental implants in the edentulous maxilla suggests that a favorable outcome of immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla can be anticipated if good primary implant stability is attained in sites with medium to dense bone quality.14 When implants are stable on insertion and are rigidly splinted with implant-retained prostheses, immediate occlusal loading of splinted mandibular implants is a successful treatment option.15 In the present clinical scenario, single-piece basal implants were selected rather than conventional two-stage implants because of the insufficient bone height available in the posterior maxilla. The basal implants are embedded in the basal bone, which is more dense, stable, and resistant to resorption and infections. Therefore, the masticatory forces are very well distributed to areas that are resistant to resorption. 16 In comparison to the traditional flap method, basal implants requiring a flapless surgical technique have reportedly been shown to provide several benefits, including less postoperative bleeding, patient discomfort, a shorter surgery time, and faster healing.17 This design prevents manipulating the implant/soft tissue contact after initial healing and eliminates the implant/abutment interface and the need for connecting abutments as a later surgery.17 Offering a beneficial implant-prosthetic interface, using pterygoid implants in full-arch rehabilitation enables the avoidance of distal cantilevers, an extension of the posterior occlusion, and an appropriate distribution of functional loads. The great primary stability of pterygoid implants is further enhanced by their engagement with the thick cortical bone of the pterygoid plates.18 Furthermore, splinting transfers masticatory stresses from the bone surrounding the implants to additional cortical regions.

A single-piece, full-arch fixed implant-supported metal-ceramic cement-retained prosthesis was chosen for both the maxillary and mandibular arch. Studies using 3D finite element analysis have shown that unseparated superstructures are superior to separated ones at reducing peri-implant bone stress when simulating occlusion at maximal intercuspation. 19 This finding offers credibility to the hypothesis that rigid splinting of the entire mandibular arch can provide greater resistance, thus minimizing the effects of mandibular flexure in the presence of a 1-piece superstructure. 20

The clinical significance of this case report lies in the strategic treatment planning employing an immediate loading protocol along with single-piece basal implants in atrophic ridges, eliminating the necessity of a removable prosthesis with enhanced patient comfort.

Conclusion 

The use of short implants in premaxillary regions and pterygoid implants in pterygomaxillary regions is an additional strategy that accelerates the healing process, lowers the chance of surgical challenges, and reduces patient discomfort and expense.18, 21 The stability of implant prosthetic restorations is enhanced, and a prosthetic distal cantilever can be eliminated by employing pterygoid implants. Immediate loading can be employed as a successful treatment option for providing function and aesthetics with the added benefit of reduced treatment time compared to conventional loading protocols, which meet the demands of the patient as well.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this article.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

R Adell U Lekholm B Rockler A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jawInt J Oral Surg198110638741610.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4

2 

P Ledermann Bar-prosthetic management of the edentulous mandible by means of plasma-coated implantation with titanium screwsDtsch Zahnarztl Z1979341290711

3 

G Romanos S Froum C Hery Survival Rate of Immediately vs Delayed Loaded Implants: Analysis of the Current LiteratureJ Oral Implantol20103643152410.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00060

4 

Immediate/Early Loading of Dental Implants: a Report from the Sociedad Espanola de Implantes World Congress Consensus Meeting in Barcelona, Spain, 2002 - Aparicio - 2003 - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research - Wiley Online Library, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00183.x (accessed 14 April 2023).Clin Implant Dent Relat Res200251576010.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00183.x

5 

S Kumar K Kumar R Singh Basal implants- A new era of prosthodontic dentistryIP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent2020611310.18231/j.aprd.2020.001

6 

PO Ostman Immediate/early loading of dental implants. Clinical documentation and presentation of a treatment conceptPeriodontol2000479011210.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00244.x

7 

JB Brunski AF Moccia SR Pollack E Korostoff DI Trachtenberg The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspectsJ Dent Res1979581019536910.1177/00220345790580100201

8 

JB Brunski JA Hipp GVB Cochran The Influence of Biomechanical Factors at the Tissue-Biomaterial Interface MRS Online Proc Lib (OPL)201111050510.1557/PROC-110-505

9 

RM Pilliar DA Deporter PA Watson N Valiquette Dental implant design--effect on bone remodelingJ Biomed Mater Res19912544678310.1002/jbm.820250405

10 

JE Davies Mechanisms of endosseous integrationInt J Prosthodont1998115391401

11 

L Sennerby J Roos Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literatureInt J Prosthodont199811540820

12 

C E Misch Contemporary implant dentistryImplant Dent19998190Mosby-Year BookSt. Louis

13 

B Idris F Houston N Claffey Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materialsJ Prosthet Dent19957455354110.1016/s0022-3913(05)80358-0

14 

M Degidi A Piattelli P Felice Immediate functional loading of edentulous maxilla: a 5-year retrospective study of 388 titanium implantsJ Periodontol200576610162410.1902/jop.2005.76.6.1016

15 

CJ Drago RJ Lazzara Immediate Occlusal Loading of Osseotite® Implants in Mandibular Edentulous Patients: A Prospective Observational Report with 18-Month DataJ Prosthodont200615318794

16 

G M Scortecci CE Misch G Odin GM Scortecci Basal ImplantologyPrinciples of Basal ImplantologySpringer International PublishingCham334

17 

T Siepenkothen Clinical performance and radiographic evaluation of a novel single-piece implant in a private practice over a mean of seventeen monthsJ Prosthet Dent2007976 supplS697810.1016/S0022-3913(07)60010-9

18 

AS Bidra G Huynh-Ba Implants in the pterygoid region: a systematic review of the literatureInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg20114087738110.1016/j.ijom.2011.04.007

19 

E Martin-Fernandez I Gonzalez-Gonzalez H Dellanos-Lanchares MA Mauvezin-Quevedo A Brizuela-Velasco A Alvarez-Arenal Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element AnalysisBiomed Res Int2018824131310.1155/2018/8241313

20 

S Yokoyama N Wakabayashi M Shiota Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implat-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructuresInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200420457883

21 

L Signorini F Faustini R Samarani Immediate fixed rehabilitation supported by pterygoid implants for participants with severe maxillary atrophy: 1-Year postloading results from a prospective cohort studyJ Prosthetic Dent20211261677510.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.005



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Case Report


Article page

111-116


Authors Details

Teena Wilson*, Vivek V Nair, Harshakumar K, Prasanth V


Article History

Received : 01-05-2023

Accepted : 02-06-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files