IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Print ISSN: 2581-4796

Online ISSN: 2581-480X

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 501

PDF Downloaded: 1270


Get Permission Hassan and Beohar: Osseodensification- A review


Introduction

Osseointegration is defined as a direct structural and functional process connection between ordered living bone and the surface of a filler wearing an implant Osseointegration is crucial for the stability of the implant which determines the long-term success of dental implants. Albrektsson T et al mentioned six main parameters such as implant material, implant surface, implant design, host factors, surgical implant technical and biomechanical factors that play a major role in achieving osseointegration. 1

Standard drill models used in osteotomies are designed to do this hollow out the bone to make room for implant placement. Remove them however, they generally do not effectively produce away from the bone Precise circumferential osteotomy. In contrast to conventional bone drilling Technologies, OD does not excavate bone tissue. OD is a no Extraction technique developed by Huwais S.2, 3 He is Manufactured with specially designed burs to increase bone density Expand the osteotomy site. The main concept of the OD technique is that the fountain design creates an environment that enhances that initial primary stability through compression of the osteotomy site bone autograft walls.

Osseodensification Concept

An osteotomy preparation procedure is recognized as Osseodensification which is a novel, biomechanical, nonexcavation. He also developed specially designed densifying burs known as Densah burs (by Versah LLC- The osseodensification company). This drill increases the primary stability via non-subtractive drilling unlike traditional drills.4 Densifying burs have the advantage during osteotomy to control the tactile and speed of drills. OD process produces a layer of autograft around the implant with an osteotomy surface. The reason behind OD conception is that autologous bone contacts through an endosteal device accelerate osseointegration because of osteoblasts nucleating on instrumented bone adjacent to the implant and have increased primary stability because of interlocking between the device and bone. 5

Features of densifying burs

  1. While the bur goes downwards in the osteotomy site this design controls the expansion process because of its conical tapered body.

  2. When rotated in a non-cutting/burnishing/counterclockwise direction, the apical end should incorporate at minimum 1 lip to grate bone and when turned in the cutting/drilling/clockwise direction it cuts the bone.

  3. Each helical flute comprises a burnishing and cutting face. When rotated in the burnishing direction it burnishes bone and when turned in the cutting direction cuts the bone.

  4. Minimum 1 lip and the lands are designed to produce an opposing axial response when constantly rotated in a burnishing direction to generate a push-back phenomenon, which produces expansion. 6

Primary stability is achieved when there are no micromovements of the implant in its fully seated position. The implant makes this possible to secondarily interlock mechanically with bone tissue stability is achieved. The stabilization of the implant is a very important factor to consider Formation of fibrous tissue around the implant. some factors that Bone density, implant design, Insertion torque (IT) and surgical technique. due to an operation trauma, 1 mm bone around the implant body is devital, resorbed and remodeled in the initial phase of osseointegration, this reduces the primary stability. Later, the bone begins to form around the implant body, increasing the BIC. This organic product Implant stability, referred to as secondary stability, results in osseointegrated implant. 7

Primary implant stability has been considered as an indicator for future osseointegration, hence the key to long term clinical success. Primary implant stability at the time of placement is often analysed by judging the presence of any mobility of implant. The primary stability on chair side can be evaluated by mobility using a blunt instrument such as a mirror handle and during follow-up visits, it can be estimated by devices such as periotest, periometer, Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), and placement torque. 8, 9

Bur design and technology

  1. The Densah burs cut the bone in a clockwise manner and densify the same in a non-cutting anticlockwise manner along with copious irrigation during the surgical procedure.

  2. The design incorporates helicalflutes separated by lands, each having a burnishing face and an opposing cutting face withina taperedgeometry. 10

  3. This ensures lesser heat productionand a faster feed rate. Bone condensation is obtained by noncutting action of the lands with a negative rake angle and cutting is obtained by chisel edge.

  4. The expansion of the osteotomy site is obtained by a tapered shank (maximum diameter adjacent to the shank and minimum diameter adjacent to the apical end). This feature allows the operator to lift away from contact instantly to allow for irrigation. 11

  5. The bur producesan outward pressure that creates a hydrodynamic compression wave when combined with irrigation at the point of contact. This drives the bone chips and debris into the implant bed rather than removing it. 12, 13, 14

Bone density and Osseodensification

Secondary stability of bone and dental implant by the process of osseointegration is vital for the success of implant placement.

The maxillary posterior region with low bone density affects histomorphometric parameters such as the percentage of bone-implant contact and bone volume, however, the increase of bone density by osseodensification has improved the negative effect thereby having a potentiating effect on secondary stability.

Stability and ossedensification

The implant primary stability is a crucial factor to achieve implant osseointegration. 15 High primary implant stability is critical in immediate loading protocols, and it was reported that an implant micromotion above 50–100 um potentiated peri‑implant bone resorption or implant failures. Li et al. 16 reported in a review no significant difference in crestal bone resorption and failure rate for inserted implants low insertion torque values. They also demonstrated the ability of OD Bits to increase %BV and % BIC for dental implants placed in low-density bone compared to traditional osteotomies that can help improvement of osseointegration. 17, 18

Convetional osteotomy and osseodensification

The biomechanical capabilities of implants are influenced by several factors factors such as the macro/micro geometry of the implant, Nanosurface Modifications and Osteotomy Techniques. 19, 20 Standard drills used at the implant site osteotomy Hollow out the bone to facilitate implant placement. They produce effective bone cutting, but lack design. Ability to create a precise circumferential osteotomy. Consequently, the osteotomies are elongated and elliptical due to inaccurate cutting of the holes. This leads to a reduced torque during implant placement, resulting in low primary stability and adds to the potential due to the non-integration of the implant.

Undersizing the implant bed preparation and using the bone condensation osteotomes 21, 22 are among them recommended surgical methods to increase primary stability of Implants and % BIC in low-density bone. Comments were also made of different models of healing and Peri-implant bone remodeling models. 23, 24 The alternative implant drilling procedure in the posterior region of the upper jaw the osteotome technique 25 aimed at densifying the bone with the mechanical action of cylindrical instruments along the OD osteotomy diameters were less than conventional osteotomies prepared with the same drills due to the elastic nature and elastic tension of bone increases the proportion of available bone at the implant site about three times.

Indications

  1. It facilitates lateral ridge expansion- Ridge with < 3 mm of width.

  2. In maxillary sinus, it enhances expansion of vertical ridge.

Contraindications

  1. Patients with various systemic disorders such as compromised immune system, bleeding disorders and titanium allergy should be excluded.

Advantages

  1. Increase in bone mineral density.

  2. During osteotomy preparation it condense and preserve bone through autografting compaction.

  3. Autografting of bony particles, creating a smoother OD hole.

  4. Primary stability, bone density and BIC are increases.

Limitations

  1. OD doesn’t work as cortical bone lacks plasticity.

  2. Prevent the densification of xenografts.

Conclusion

Patients demand for a shorter and a faster final treatment. With the introduction of specially designed burs, making OD possible, not only reduces treatment time but, also gives a successful implant outcome. Modern dentistry focuses on techniques that ensure maximum durability and aesthetics as well as preserves as much viable tissue as possible. In the osseodensification the Densah burs guarantees an advantage over traditional osteotomy in no uncertain terms atleast in theory. But, it is a relatively new concept and the biological implications on a long term basis are yet to be evaluated by longitudinal studies.

Source of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

1 

T Albrektsson P I Branemark H A Hansson J Lindstrom Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long lasting, direct bone to imlant anchorage in manActa Orthop Scand19815221557010.3109/17453678108991776

2 

S Huwais Fluted Osteotome and Surgical Method for Use. US2013/ 0004918. U.P.A2013U.P.A

3 

E Seeman Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strengthJ Bone Miner Metab200826118

4 

S Huwais Enhancing implant stability with osseodensification — a case report with 2-year follow-upImplant Pract2015812834

5 

B Lahens R Neiva N Tovar AM Alifarag R Jimbo EA Bonfante Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep”J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201663566510.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007

6 

M Degidi Influence of under preparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: An in vitro study”J Oral Maxillofac Surg20157361084810.1016/j.joms.2015.01.029

7 

H Caulier I Naert W Kalk JA Jansen The relationship of some histologic parameters, radiographic evaluations, and Periotest measurements of oral implants: an experimental animal studyInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants19971233806

8 

SM Yang SY Shin SB Kye Relationship between implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and bone loss during early healing periodOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod20081052129

9 

AM Hofbauer Osseodensification Facilitates Ridge Expansion with Enhanced Implant Stability in The Maxilla: Part II Case Report With 2-Year Follow-Up” Implant Pract2015821421

10 

RB Summers A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome techniqueCompendium19941521546

11 

S Gayathri Osseodensification Technique - A Novel Bone Preservation Method to Enhance Implant StabilityActa Scientific Dent Sci20182121722

12 

LF Gil A Sarendranath R Neiva HF Marão N Tovar EA Bonfante Bone healing around dental implants: Simplified vs. Conventional drilling protocols at speed of 400 rpmInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants20173223293610.11607/jomi.4802

13 

SK Mishra R Chowdhary Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy-a review: heat generated by dental implant drillsJ Indian Prosthodont Soc20141421314310.1007/s13191-014-0350-6

14 

H Li Y Liang Q Zheng Meta-analysis of correlations between marginal bone resorption and high insertion torque of dental implantsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants20153047677210.11607/jomi.3884

15 

S Huwais Enhancing implant stability with osseodensification: A two year follow upImplant Pract201582834

16 

U Das G Mohanty R Mohanty R Nayak Printing Innovative Approach in DentistryIndian J Public Health Res Dev2019101111246

17 

K Søballe H Brockstedt-Rasmussen ES Hansen C Bünger Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation. Controlled micromotion studied in dogsActa Orthop Scand19926321284010.3109/17453679209154808

18 

K Søballe ES Hansen H Brockstedt-Rasmussen C Bünger Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implantsJ Bone Joint Surg Br1993752270810.1302/0301-620X.75B2.8444949

19 

PG Coelho R Jimbo Osseointegration of metallic devices: Current trends based on implant hardware designArch Biochem Biophys201456199108 10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.033

20 

H Alghamdi PS Anand S Anil Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: A prospective clinical studyJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2011691250612

21 

RB Summers A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome techniqueCompendium19941521524

22 

CM Boustany H Reed G Cunningham M Richards A Kanawati Effect of a modified stepped osteotomy on the primary stability of dental implants in low&#8209;density bone: A cadaver studyInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants2015301485510.11607/jomi.3720

23 

FE Campos JB Gomes C Marin HS Teixeira M Suzuki L Witek Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: An experimental study in dogsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2012701435010.1016/j.joms.2011.08.006

24 

PG Coelho C Marin HS Teixeira FE Campos JB Gomes F Guastaldi Biomechanical evaluation of undersized drilling on implant biomechanical stability at early implantation timesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2013712697510.1016/j.joms.2012.10.008

25 

A Büchter J Kleinheinz HP Wiesmann J Kersken M Nienkemper HV Weyhrother Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome techniqueClin Oral Implants Res20051611810.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01081.x



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Review Article


Article page

203-206


Authors Details

Shaik Ali Hassan, Gaurav Beohar


Article History

Received : 18-10-2022

Accepted : 25-10-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files