IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Print ISSN: 2581-4796

Online ISSN: 2581-480X

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 527

PDF Downloaded: 641


Get Permission Verma, Arya, Singh, Gupta, Pathak, and Tripathi: A study to evaluate etiology of denture stomatitis and to determine interrelationship with trauma and candida albicans count


Introduction

Insertion of complete dentures is not the final step in treatment of edentulous patients. When edentulous patients are delivered complete dentures, the important phase of oral and denture aftercare begins.1 Initial recommendations to patients include need for periodical visits to the dentist for maintenance purposes and explaining denture cleaning and wearing habit. 2, 3

Studies have shown that most denture wearers with poor denture cleanliness, poor oral hygiene, or those who wear dentures at night have the accumulation of a characteristic biofilm, which could damage adjacent mucosa cause denture stomatitis or systemic diseases. 4, 5, 6, 7 Denture Stomatitis (DS) is a common oral disease in denture wearers and it is associated with multiple etiological and predisposing factors. It is divided into three types: Type I shows localized inflammation or pinpoint hyperemia; Type II shows more diffused erythema and Type III is a non-neo-plastic papillary hyperplasia with inflammation to a varying degree. Type I DS may be due to trauma from the denture (occlusion, undercuts, stability etc.) to the denture bearing area, whereas Type II and III may be associated with infection together with mechanical trauma. The prevalence of the three types of DS in different groups of elderly population has been reported to vary in the range of 10–65 %.8, 9

Adherence of Candida albicans to the acrylic surfaces of denture may be because of local or systemic factors that has been associated with pathology of DS. But, none of the factor has been found to be confirmed.10 So this study was planned to ruled out the association of local as well as systemic factor with DS along with role of trauma among North Indian population.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted on 195 subjects suffering from denture stomatitis visiting the Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental sciences, K G Medical University, Lucknow.

The study design was a cross sectional questionnaire-based study with fungal count testing, denture cleanliness scores and testing of trauma by erythema score in patients with denture stomatitis. Ethical clearance was taken from University and study was completed in 1 year Subjects wearing previously fabricated removable partial or complete dentures attending the Department of Prosthodontics, KGMU, UP who were diagnosed with denture stomatitis were included in the study. A diagnosis of denture stomatitis is made when erythema/hyperemia/hyperplasia is seen in relation to the denture base.

Demographic data of patients was recorded that includes name, age, gender, education and socioeconomic status. Subjects were asked about duration of wearing denture and whether they removed their denture at night and if yes then how frequently, also subjects were enquired about history of smoking, tobacco chewing, alcohol and any allergy, medication, preexisting diseases.

After recording their consent, a close-ended questionnaire 11, 12 previously used in various studies covering multiple factors linked with denture stomatitis was given to the subjects in their language of preference (English/Hindi). Their responses were correlated with presence and severity of denture stomatitis. Also, scores given by a team of 3 dentists (majority opinion /consensus) on the presence and severity of denture stomatitis, presence /absence of trauma, fungal absence/presence and denture hygiene score was used to identify etiological and associated factors of denture stomatitis. The investigation was carried out at mid-morning at least 2 hours after drinking, eating or any oral hygiene procedure to avoid diurnal variations. (Table 1, Table 2)

For mycological study, swab sample was taken by rolling sterile cotton swab across the site of denture stomatitis and was immediately smeared on to the surface of culture medium with Saubauroud’s dextrose agar (SDA - with chloramphenicol).

Plates were aerobically incubated at 37 °C for 48-72 hrs. Culture growth which was negative for candida growth was left on the bench for another 72hrs and examined again, before been discarded as negative. Number of candida colonies were determined by counting colony forming units on SDA plates. Preliminary identification for candida was carried out after the growth of characteristic creamy, convex yeast colonies on SDA. Smear will be made for gram staining and was examined under microscope to recognize gram positive budding cells. Yeast was identified as Candida albicans on the basis of positive germ tube test.13

Examination of denture cleanliness was made using a plaque detector (proflavine-monosulphate in a 0.3% aqueous solution) to disclose plaque on intaglio surface of the denture. According to quantity of plaque on the denture base, patients were divided into three groups by using Budtz-Jorgensen's Index (Budtz-Jorgensen & Bertram, 1970) of denture cleanliness:13

  1. Excellent: None or only few spots of plaque

  2. Fair: More extended plaque, less than half of the denture base covered by plaque

  3. Poor: More than half of denture base covered by plaque

Association of gender, age, partial/complete denture wearer, duration of wear ,how old the denture is, systemic disease, allergy ,oral denture hygiene, tobacco/alcohol use, presence/absence of trauma and presence/absence of fungi was correlated with presence and extent of denture stomatitis. The null hypothesis was that denture stomatitis occurs independent of all above mentioned factors.

An evaluation of collected data was made with the help of standard tests such as mean, standard deviation, T test and Chi-square test. P value of 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was made using the statistical software SPSS 10.0 for Windows. Descriptive statistics was made and the normality of distribution was tested by the one-way Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To test significance between different variables the Kruskal-Wallis test was used if distribution of data is not normal, and if distribution is normal ANOVA test was used.

Results

A total of 195 patients were included in the study, out of which 62.1% were male and 37.9% were female.

Mean Age of studied subjects were 56.76 year (S.D. = 12.39). Median Age was 56.0 year. Most of the patients were between 41 – 50 age groups. 60 % of patients chew tobacco and out of which 23 % chew daily. 22.56 % of patient’s drinks alcohol. 26.15% patients having systemic disease. Hypertension was most common systemic 54.9%. Patients had no history of allergy. 89.23% patients remove their denture at night.73.33% patients remove the denture every day at night and 13.33% patients remove alternate days, 82.56 %. Brushing with tooth paste was most common method of cleaning (44.10%) than hand soaping, rising (36.41%) and rinsing and soaking in water is minimum (19.49%).

Table 1

Questionnaire of Oral Denture Hygiene

Oral &Denture Hygiene

1.

Do you remove your dentures at night?

a)

Yes

b)

No

c)

Not answered

2.

If Yes, how often?

a)

Every day

b)

Alternative days

c)

Once a week

d)

2 times / week

3.

How do you clean your dentures?

a)

Brush with toothpaste

b)

Rinsing or soaking in water

c)

Soaking in a solution(denture cleaner, sodium hypochlorite)

d)

Hand Soaping and rinsing

e)

Don’t clean

4.

When (how frequently) do you clean your dentures?

a)

Twice a day

b)

Every day

c)

Alternative day

d)

Once a week

e)

2 times/week

f)

Never

5.

How do you maintain oral hygiene?

a)

Brush twice a day

b)

Brush once a day

c)

Rinse mouth after meals

d)

Do nothing

6.

Has a dentist or his staff ever shown you or told you how to clean your dentures?

a) Yes

b) No

Table 2

Questionnaire of Clinical Denture Examination

Clinical Denture Examination

1.

Degree of erythema score:

0:

No Stomatitis

1:

Slight Stomatitis (Localized slight hyperaemia)

2:

Moderate Stomatitis(Diffuse hyperaemia)

3:

Severe Stomatitis (Diffuse and papillary hyperplasia)

2.

Denture cleanliness or hygiene score:

Excellent (1):

None or only few spots of plaque

Fair(2):

More extended plaque, less than half of the denture base covered by plaque Poor(3): More than half of denture base covered by plaque

3.

Test for Candida albicans presence

Absent/Present

If present count:

4.

Signs of trauma from denture

Yes/No

If yes ,due to

a.

Occlusion

b.

Stability

c.

Extension

d.

Undercuts

Table 3

Denture Cleanliness or Hygiene score

Denture cleanliness

Percentage %

Percentage%

Excellent

41

21.03

Fair

100

51.28

Poor

54

27.69

Total

195

100

Table 4

Candida and Hygiene score

Hygiene score

Excellent %

Fair %

Poor %

Candida

Absent

36

87.8

73

33

36

66.7

Present

5

12.2

27

27

18

33.3

Total

41

100

100

60

54

100

[i] 'x2' = 5.66 'p'=0.05(Sig.)

Table 5

Candida albicans colony count

Option

N

Percentage

One large colony 20 – 30

6

12.00

One large colony

11

22.00

Two candid colony

5

10.00

Two colony of candida

6

12.00

Two large colony

10

20.00

Three large colony

6

12.00

Three large colony

6

12.000

Total

50

100.00

Table 6

Candida and trauma

Candida

No

Yes

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Absent

139

73.45

6

100.00

Present

50

26.55

0

0.0

Total

189

100.00

6

100.00

[i] x2' = 2.14    'p'=0.14 (NS) No significant relation of trauma.

Table 7

Correlation of Candida with removal of denture at night

Candida

No

Yes

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

'x2' = 5.902 'p'=0.015

Removal of Denture at night

Absent

11

52.40

134

77.00

Present

10

47.60

40

23.0

Total

121

100.00

74

100.00

Table 8

Correlation with Candida with frequency of cleaning

Candida

Twice a day

Everyday

Alternate day

Once a week

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Absent

12

66.70

111

79.30

22

68.80

0

0.00

Present

6

33.30

29

20.70

10

31.20

5

50.00

Total

18

100.0

140

100.0

32

100.0

5

100.0

[i] 'x2' = 17.37 'p'=0.001 (Sig.)

Table 9

Correlation of Candida with maintenance of oral hygiene

Candida

Brush twice a day

Brush once a day

Rinse mouth after meal

Used of powder

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Absent

12

100.0

100

89.3

27

41.54

6

100.0

Present

0

0.0

12

10.7

38

58.46

0

0.0

Total

12

100.0

112

100.0

65

100.0

6

100.0

[i] 'x2' = 56.02 'p'=0.000 (Sig.)

Table 10

Candida and Degree of erythema score

Candida

No

Slight

Moderate

Severe

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Absent

5

100.0

93

90.3

29

46.03

6

25.0

Present

0

0.0

10

9.70

34

53.97

18

75.0

Total

5

100.0

103

100.0

63

100.0

24

100.0

[i] 'x2' = 55.25 'p'=0.0 (Sig.)

Everyday cleaning of denture was most common in 71.80% subjects followed by alternate day (16.41%) and once a week was (2.56%) minimum. Denture cleanliness/hygiene score in 51.28 % subjects was fair, excellent in 21.03% and poor in 27.69 % patients. (Table 3, Table 4) Candida was more with poor denture cleanliness condition. Candida was present in 25.64% (n=50) patients. One large colony was most common in 22% of subjects followed by two large colony (20%). (Table 5)

Only 5 subjects (2.56%) showed trauma from denture (Table 6). The candida was significantly more in the subjects who and does not remove the denture at night. (Table 7) Candida significantly more occurred in the subjects who have cleaned their denture once a week.Candida was maximum in patients rinse mouth after meals then others and significant. (Table 8, Table 9)

Out of 195 patients’s slight stomatitis was present in 52.80% patients, followed by moderate stomatitis 32.31% and no stomatitis was 2.56% (Minimum). Candida significantly more common in moderate than others. (Table 10)

Discussion

Candida albicans is a dimorphic yeast strongly gram positive able to live as normal commensal organism in the oral cavity of healthy people and more frequently isolated in the oral cavity. Presence of denture is a predisposing factor for the onset of pathologies related to C. albicans. Clinical studies have shown that C. albicans is not only able to adhere to the mucous surfaces, but also to stick to the acrylic resins of the dental prostheses. Both the plaque accumulated on the denture and the poor oral hygiene contributes to the virulence of Candida, offering the clinical picture of Candida-associated denture stomatitis.14 Multifactorial etiological factors contribute to DS, but it seems that Candida plays the key role.15

Several methods for sampling (mouth rinsing, denture imprint and swabbing) are available to detect oral yeast carriage; swabbing is most commonly used particularly easy in elderly subjects.15

Detection of Candida is important step. Several methods are available for this which can be broadly classified into microscopic examination {specific and non-specific staining/ FISH (Fluorescence in situ hybridization)} conventional detection methods (culture based, serological, nucleic acid based) and nonconventional techniques (Lab chip device based), culture media is still considered gold standard.16 Common culture media for isolating clinical candida species are blood agar, potato dextrose agar (PDA) or broth (PDB), Sabouraud brain heart infusion agar, Yeast nitrogen base (YNB) etc.17 In Present study Cultivatable Candida species were then identified from the macroscopic morphology of colonies and from additional tests after subculture on Sabouraud agar with chloramphenicol and gentamycin, the latter involved namely germ tube formation in human serum.18 Recently to distinguish various morphotypes TEM (Transmission electron microscopy), Phase contrast microscopy and SEM (scanning electron microscopy) are also used.19 Colonies of candida were counted on SDA culture, and the most commonly found presentation was two candida colony in 42% cases followed by one large colony in 34% subjects and 24% subjects with 3 large colonies.  Colony forming unit count was estimated by using the following formula: CFU/mL=1000×number of colonies/4.20 So, in present study 500cfu/ml was most common whereas least one was 750cfu/ml.

Candida associated denture stomatitis represents as a condition affected by multiple factors that can be either systemic or local. In Local factors saliva play dual role in pathogenesis of denture stomatitis because mechanically saliva cleans the oral cavity and reduces the adhesion of Candida to the acrylic resin of dentures, but some studies states that salivary proteins like mucines and the statherins may act as adhesion receptors for Candida by interacting with its mannoproteins.21

In our study lack of oral hygiene has been found more frequently in patient with DS also habit of nocturnal denture wearing. These habits cause spontaneous remission of infection and increase the susceptibility to candidiasis. 22, 23, 24 According to Ghalib et al number of Candida species decreases significantly with increased cleaning frequencies as denture brushing frequencies increased, the numbers of Candida in the saliva decreased. Furthermore, cleaning frequencies were inversely proportional to the levels of Candida species in saliva.21

In the present study for the measurement of denture cleanliness we used Budtz-Jørgensen Index and mostly patients were found in fair category.25

Denture surface plays role in presence of candida, the micro-porosity on denture intaglio surface promotes the growth of yeast leading to stomatitis.26, 27 Trauma is also one of the local factors which can be due to ill fitted denture or due to unbalanced occlusion does not play a direct role but it acts as co-factor which helps in or increases candida adhesion to the tissue under denture.28

Besides local factors, systemic factors also showed association with denture stomatitis. Systemic illness like diabetes and Renal disease and xerostomia does not directly cause denture stomatitis but they play major role in decreasing host immunity and favorable environment for candida growth. One co-relating factor between candida growth and diabetes can be decrease in salivary secretion or xerostomia that promotes candida growth. With increasing age salivary secretion decreases. Besides diabetes and aging xerostomia also presents as a side effect of some drugs like antihypertensive, antipsychotic, antidepressant etc. which are common in old age population and promotes candida growth.29

Conclusion

Denture stomatitis is a disease with multifactorial etiologies and Candida albicans is as one of the causative factors for this in North Indian population. Though Several systemic and local factors play important role but presence of denture with poor oral as well as denture hygiene aggravate the condition. Candida-associated denture stomatitis, even if asymptomatic, should be treated as it may act as reservoir for infections more extensive and encourage the resorption of the alveolar bone. Topical therapy is the first line of treatment, use of clotrimazole or nystatin lozenges with the denture removed from the mouth, is recommended. Besides the pharmacological treatment maintenance of good oral hygiene as well as denture cleanliness plays equally important role.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this paper.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

L Marchini E Tamashiro D F Nascimento Self-reported denture hygiene of a sample of edentulous attendees at a University dental clinic and the relationship to the condition of the oral tissuesGerodontology2004214226810.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00026.x

2 

D C Jagger A Harrison Denture cleansing - the best approachBr Dent J199517811413710.1038/sj.bdj.4808788

3 

K Shay Denture hygiene: a review and updateJ Contemp Dent Pract2000122841

4 

Brazil Ministry of Health - National Oral Health Division. SB Brasil Project: Oral Health Conditions of the Brazilian Population 2002–20032004Main Results. Brası´lia: Ministry of Health

5 

J J Collis G D Stafford A survey of denture hygiene in patients attending Cardiff dental hospitalEur J Prosthodont Restor Dent1994326771

6 

G Hoad-Reddick A Grant C S Griffiths Investigation into the cleanliness of dentures in elderly populationJ Prosthet Dent1990641485210.1016/0022-3913(90)90152-3

7 

S Khasawneh A Al-Wahadni Control of denture plaque and mucosal inflammation in denture wearersJ Ir Dent Assoc20024841328

8 

RF Souza L Patrocı´nio A C Pero Reliability and validation of a Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing edentulous subjectsJ Oral Rehabil20073411821610.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01749.x

9 

T M Arendorf D M Walker Denture stomatitis: a reviewJ Oral Rehabil19871432172710.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00713.x

10 

M C Thiele A D Carvalho L C Gursky The role of candidal histolytic enzymes on denture-induced stomatitis in patients living in retirement homesGerodontology20082542293610.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00221.x

11 

A S Takamiya D R Monteiro VARicardo Barão AC Pero MA Compagnoni, DB Barbosa Complete denture hygiene and nocturnal wearing habits among patients attending the Prosthodontic Department in a Dental University in Brazil192828291610.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00369.x

12 

E Budtz-Jorgensen U Bertram Denture stomatitis. I.The etiology in relation to trauma and infectionActa Odontoi Scand1970281719210.3109/00016357009033133

13 

Kulak-Ozkany E Kazazoglu A Arikan Oral hygiene habits, denture cleanliness, presence of yeasts and stomatitis in elderly peopleJ Oral Rehab2002293300410.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00816.x

14 

C Salerno M Pascale M Contaldo V Esposito M Busciolano L Milillo Candida-associated denture stomatitisMed Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal20111623943

15 

S Fanello J P Bouchara N Jousset V Delbos A M Le Flohic Nosocomial Candida albicans acquisition in a geriatric unit: epidemiology and evidence for person-to-person transmissionJ Hosp Infect2001471465210.1053/jhin.2000.0849

16 

M Safavieh C Coarsey Advances in Candida detection platforms for clinical and point-of-care applicationsCrit Rev Biotechnol201737444158

17 

P Madhavan F Jamal PP Chong Laboratory isolation and identification of candida speciesJ. Applied Sci2011111628707

18 

A V Abbeele H Meel M Ahariz J P Perraudin Denture contamination by yeasts in the elderlyThe Gerodontology20082542228

19 

M Staniszewska M Bondaryk Candida albicans morphologies revealed by scanning electron microscopy analysisBraz J Microbiol201344381321

20 

L Prakash C Kantheti BVR Reddy Isolation, identification, and carriage of candidal species in PHLAs and their correlation with immunological status in cases with and without HAARTJOMFP20121613844

21 

AN Ghalib SS Gul JF Abdulkareem Relationships of Candida with Frequency of Brushing, Age and Smoking in Patients with Removable Dental Prosthesis: A Quantitative StudySulaimani Dent J201741128

22 

AJW Turrell Aetiology of inflamed upper denture-bearing tissuesBr Dent J1966120115426

23 

JD Schulman F Rivera-Hidalgo MM Beach Risk factors associated with denture stomatitis in the United StatesJ Oral Pathol Med2005346340610.1111/j.1600-0714.2005.00287.x

24 

M A Compagnoni R F Souza J Marra A C Pero D B Barbosa Relationship between Candida and nocturnal denture wear:quantitative studyJ Oral Rehabil20073486005

25 

HFO Paranhos CHL Silva RF Souza KMF Pontes Evaluation of three indices for biofilm accumulation on complete denturesGerodontology20102713340

26 

MAF Ferreira T Pereira-Cenci LMR de Vasconcelos L M Rodrigues-Garcia AA Del Bel Cury RCM Rodrigues-Garcia Efficacy of denture cleansers on denture liners contaminated with Candida speciesClin Oral Investig200913223742

27 

B C Webb C J Thomas M D Willcox D W Harty K W Knox B C Webb Aetiology and management: a review. Part 1. Factors influencing distribution of Candida species in the oral cavityAust Dent J1998434550

28 

G Nyquist A Study of Denture Sore Mouth; An Investigation of Traumatic, Allergic and Toxic Lesions of the Oral Mucosa Arising from the Use of Full DenturesActa Odontoi Scand19521091154

29 

R R Obradović L G Kesić A A Pejčić M S Petrović N D Živković D M Živković Diabetes mellitus and oral candidiasisActa Stomatol Naissi20112763102534



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

151-156


Authors Details

Aditi Verma, Deeksha Arya, Saumyendra Vikram Singh, Prashant Gupta, Anupama Pathak, Shuchi Tripathi


Article History

Received : 30-07-2021

Accepted : 08-09-2021


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files