Print ISSN: 2581-4796
Online ISSN: 2581-480X
IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 3, Issue : 1, Year : 2017
Article Page : 16-24
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the influence of the different veneering technique to zirconia on biaxial flexural strength of ceramic bilayer.
Materials and Methods: Forty-five (45) disc-shape specimens (10 mm in ɸ, 0.5 mm thickness) were prepared from each zirconia (e.max ZirCAD (Zz), inCoris TZI (Zi), Cercon (Zc)) and randomly veneered with either a conventional layering technique, using IPS e.max Ceram (Pc), heat-pressed technique using IPS e.max Zirpress (Ph), and Cad-fused veneering technique using IPS e.max CAD (Pf). The bilayer specimens were adjusted and glazed to the final dimension (10±0.05 mm in ɸ, 1.5±0.01 mm in thickness). Piston on three balls method was used to determine the biaxial flexural strength at 0.5 mm/min cross-head speed. The loads to failure were recorded and calculated for biaxial flexural strengths using Hsueh formula. Data were analyzed through ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and Weibull analysis.
Results: The biaxial flexural strength (Mean±SD; MPa) and Weibull modulus (m) for each group were: ZzPc= 623.07±62.07, 11.11; ZiPc= 643.97±63.83, 11.30; ZcPc= 612.07±70.24, 9.50; ZzPh= 660.34±63.6, 11.20; ZiPh= 693.13±65.81, 11.69; ZcPh= 683.88±61.72, 12.18; ZzPf= 935.64±62.37, 16.41; ZiPf= 857.34±62.31, 14.98; ZcPf=721.34±58.67, 13.79. The flexural strength was significantly affected for different types of zirconia and veneering techniques (p<0.05). The CAD-fused veneering technique indicated significantly higher flexural strength than the others (p<0.05). Flexural strengths upon using IPS e.max ZirCAD were significantly higher than Cercon (p<0.05), but comparable to inCoris TZI (p>0.05).
Conclusions: The IPS emax ZirCAD and CAD-fused veneering technique were capable of providing high flexural strength for ceramic veneering zirconia.
Keywords: Flexural strength, Zirconia, Veneering technique
How to cite : Juntavee N, Hien N T M, Chatrchiwiwatana S, Biaxial flexural strength of ceramic veneering techniques to yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline. IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;3(1):16-24
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.