IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Print ISSN: 2581-4796

Online ISSN: 2581-480X

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

96-100


Authors Details

Kiran Laxmikant Awchat*, Deepa Vinod Bhat, Edwin Andrews, Nishant Sinha


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 376

PDF Downloaded: 1450


In pursuit of gold standard shade guide method, a comparative in-vivo study between manual and digital shade guides


Original Article

Author Details : Kiran Laxmikant Awchat*, Deepa Vinod Bhat, Edwin Andrews, Nishant Sinha

Volume : 9, Issue : 2, Year : 2023

Article Page : 96-100

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.aprd.2023.020



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: The available shade guide system in dentistry includes Manual and Digital. Although there is lot of research going on better system to choose dental shade but still there are many factors including source of light illuminating the tooth, the characteristics of tooth and the observer viewing the tooth which needs to study further. In this study, a comparative analysis is made between the Manual and Digital shade guide systems.
Objective: The objective of the study is to record the manual (subjective method) and a digital shade (Objective method) of 500 subjects by two observers (Prosthodontist 1 {P1} and Prosthodontist 2 {P2}).
Materials and Methods : 500 patients having a complete set of anterior teeth with sound maxillary central incisors were selected for the study. Manual shade selection (Vita 3D Master) of 50% of subjects is made by P1. Then P2 does shade selection of the same subjects by digital method (Vita Easy Shade Advance) and records the deviation of values including ?E, ?L, ?C, and ?h by digital shade guide from the manual shade as recorded by P1 using verification mode of Digital shade guide. Recording of shades and deviation values is done for the remaining 50 % of patients by role reversal between P1 and P2.
Results: The kappa correlation values for Hue value and chroma when P1 records manually and P2 documents shade by digital shade guide include 0.26, 0.42, and 0.13 indicating fair, moderate, and slight to no agreement respectively. The kappa correlation values for Hue value and chroma when P2 records manually and P1 records shade by digital shade guide include -0.08, 0.51 and 0.12 indicating no agreement, moderate and slight to no agreement respectively.
Conclusion: It is advisable to use technology to overcome the errors of subjectivity. Due to edge loss with a spectrophotometer, especially in the incisal and cervical region, a combination of digital and manual systems always comes in handy when deciding on a particular shade or shade map.
 

Keywords: Shade matching, Shade guides, Spectrophotometer


How to cite : Awchat K L, Bhat D V, Andrews E, Sinha N, In pursuit of gold standard shade guide method, a comparative in-vivo study between manual and digital shade guides. IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent 2023;9(2):96-100

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.