IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Print ISSN: 2581-4796

Online ISSN: 2581-480X

IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (APRD) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

Article type

Review Article


Article page

143- 149


Authors Details

Rohit Raghavan, Shajahan PA, Riya Susan Mathew*


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 669

PDF Downloaded: 1294


Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using different retention systems: A review


Review Article

Author Details : Rohit Raghavan, Shajahan PA, Riya Susan Mathew*

Volume : 8, Issue : 3, Year : 2022

Article Page : 143-149

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.aprd.2022.029



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Maxillofacial abnormalities are the most deleterious to a person's self-esteem and quality of life. Restoration of speech, deglutition, and masticatory functions as well as achieving a normal orofacial appearance are the main objectives of rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects. Any prosthesis can be held in place by anatomical, mechanical, chemical, or surgical anchorage, depending on the clinical scenario. Various methods of retention have evolved over a period of time. Osseointegrated implants have been employed to enhance the retention of facial prosthesis, in the last 20 years. The prosthodontist should be familiar with all the available options, to opt for the appropriate retentive method, while planning for the prosthetic rehabilitation for the patient. In all cases of maxillofacial deformities, optimal outcomes could be a challenging task to accomplish, but careful evaluation, clinical decision-making, and planning can result in prosthesis of acceptable quality that might enhance the patient's quality of life.
 

Keywords: Maxillofacial prosthesis, Retention, Adhesives, Magnets, Implants, Osseointegration


How to cite : Raghavan R, Shajahan Pa, Mathew R S, Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using different retention systems: A review. IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022;8(3):143-149

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.