- Visibility 39 Views
- Downloads 28 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.aprd.12548.1896453513
-
CrossMark
Intraoral scanners in digital dentistry
- Author Details:
-
Rachamalla Srilekha *
-
C Ravi Kumar
-
Y Ravi Shankar
-
AV Rajanikanth
-
G Harilal
Rachamalla Srilekha *
The integration of intraoral scanners (IOS) into prosthodontics represents a transformative advancement in digital dentistry, offering significant improvements in clinical workflows, accuracy, and patient comfort. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence regarding the use, benefits, and limitations of intra oral scanners in prosthodontic procedures, including crown and bridge fabrication, implant prosthodontics, removable prostheses, and maxillofacial prostheses. Compared to conventional impression techniques, intraoral scanners demonstrate high precision and reproducibility. However, challenges remain in full-arch scanning and capturing edentulous areas due to limitations in soft tissue management and scanner software algorithms. Additionally, factors such as scanning strategies, operator experience, and the type of intra oral scanners used can significantly influence outcomes. The review highlights current technologies, discusses clinical applications, and suggests areas for future research to optimize digital workflows in prosthodontics.
References
- Mangano F, Veronesi G, Hauschild U. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
[Google Scholar] - Güth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digital and conventional impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(5):1445–
- https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4
[Google Scholar] - Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):465–72. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/clr.12567
[Google Scholar] - Aswani K, Wankhade S, Khalikar A, Deogade S. Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(1):27-37. https://doi.org/ 10.4103/jips.jips_327_19
[Google Scholar] - Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146(5):673–82. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
[Google Scholar] - Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics Lasers in Eng. 2014;54:203–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
[Google Scholar] - Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Srilekha / IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2025;11(3):210-215 215 Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(3):313–20. https://doi.org/
- 1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011.
- Shujaat S, Bornstein MM, Price JB, Jacobs R. Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows - possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(7):20210268. https://doi.org/
- 1259/dmfr.20210268.
- Burhardt L, Livas C, Kerdijk W, Meer WJ, Bronkhorst E, Schols J. Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(2):261-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.027
[Google Scholar] - Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:10. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1472-6831-
[Google Scholar] 14-10. - Gill S, Agrawal D, Badwaik P, Bhatnagar V, Mahesh S. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of complete dentures fabricated by subtractive and additive manufacturing – a systematic review and meta- analysis. The journal of prosthetic and implant dentistry / volume 8 issue 2 / january–april 2025
- Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: A review to make a successful impression. J Healthcare Eng. 2017:8427595. https://doi.org/
- 1155/2017/8427595.
- Schimmel M, Akino N, Srinivasan M, Wittneben JG, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1839-1847. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00784-020-03486-z
[Google Scholar] - Saravanan S, Mathew CA, Singaravelu SK, Raju PK. Application of digital technology in implant dentistry-an overview. Int J Adv Res. 2020;8(12):261–71
- Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):101–29.