- Visibility 330 Views
- Downloads 302 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.aprd.2025.023
-
CrossMark
Digital impressions in implant dentistry: Revolutionizing accuracy, comfort, and efficiency
- Author Details:
-
Sidhartha S P Behara *
-
Sunil Kumar M V
-
Akhila Devi Kakarlapudi
-
KaumudhiKalla
-
Sneha Gontu
-
Mayadevi
Sidhartha S P Behara *
Akhila Devi Kakarlapudi
Mayadevi
Digital impression technology has revolutionized implant dentistry by improving the planning, placement, and restoration of implants. Traditional conventional impression techniques were often inaccurate and uncomfortable. Intraoral scanners now provide precise 3D models for accurate surgical guides and prosthetic designs, integrating with CAD/CAM software for efficient workflows. The benefits include enhanced precision, reduced chair time, and improved patient comfort. Real-time feedback and seamless CAD/CAM integration minimize errors. Clinically, digital impressions support pre-surgical planning, custom guides, and follow-up care, improving implant success rates, especially with CBCT integration. Challenges include high costs, clinician training, and limitations in scanning certain areas. Environmental factors like moisture and large file management also pose difficulties. However, advancements in implant planning software and CAD/CAM technologies continue to improve efficiency. Future innovations in AI, machine learning, and cloud systems will further enhance diagnostic accuracy and accessibility, transforming implant dentistry and patient care.
Keywords: Digital Impression, Implants, Impression Techniques, Models
References
- Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falcão C, Lemos BF, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos- Santos J, et al. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021:18(3):1020.
- D’Ambrosio F, Giordano F, Sangiovanni G, Di Palo MP, Amato M. Conventional versus Digital Dental Impression Techniques: What Is the Future? An Umbrella Review. Prosthesis 2023;5(3):851–75.
- Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, et al. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(8):660–78.
- Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(6):573–85.
- de Oliveira NRC, Pigozzo MN, Sesma N, Laganá DC. Clinical efficiency and patient preference of digital and conventional workflow for single implant crowns using immediate and regular digital impression: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(8):669–86.
- Bishti S, Tuna T, Rittich A, Wolfart S. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant-supported reconstructions using digital workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(Suppl 21):318-35.
- García-Gil I, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J, Jiménez-García J, Peláez- Rico J, Suárez-García MJ. Precision and practical usefulness of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry: A systematic literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(8):e784-93.
- Zhang YJ, Shi JY, Qian SJ, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021;14(2):157–79.
- Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Özcan M, Pradíes G. An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(8):650–5.
- Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):1-13.
- Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(6):648–53.
- Rutkūnas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D, Vaitiekūnas M. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(Suppl 1):101–20.
- Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsk E, Mangano C. Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative In Vitro Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163107.
- Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Keul C, A New Method for the Evaluation of the Accuracy of Full‐Arch Digital Impressions In Vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7)1487–94.
- Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, Van Der Meer WJ, and Wismeijer DW, Applicability and Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanner for Scanning Multiple Implants in Edentulous Mandibles: A Pilot Study. J Prosthetic Dent. 2014;111(3):186–94.